A Thai company can legally own land. The question is whether your Thai shareholders are genuine investors or nominees. If they are nominees, the structure is illegal, enforceable, and as of 2025 being prosecuted at a scale Thailand has not seen before. This guide covers when a Thai company structure works, when it does not, and what the enforcement environment looks like right now.
Company structure vs leasehold: which to use
Thai company structure | Registered leasehold | |
|---|---|---|
Land ownership | Yes (via company) | No (right to use only) |
Legal if nominees used | No | N/A |
Legal if genuine Thai co-investors | Yes | Yes |
Complexity | High | Low to medium |
Annual compliance cost | 30,000 to 50,000 baht | None |
Supreme Court lease risk | N/A | Yes (March 2025 ruling) |
Best for | Genuine joint ventures, villa businesses | Personal residence, lifestyle buyers |
Enforcement risk in 2026 | High if nominee structure | Lower |
The 2025-2026 enforcement warning
This is the most important section for any buyer considering a Thai company structure.
Thailand's 2025-2026 nominee crackdown is the largest enforcement action against foreign land ownership structures in the country's history. Authorities targeted 46,000+ companies, resulting in 852 prosecutions and THB 15.1 billion in documented damages. The crackdown specifically targets nominee shareholder arrangements where Thai nationals hold shares on behalf of foreigners with no genuine economic interest. This is not a theoretical risk in 2026 โ it is an active enforcement priority.
The historical pattern of inconsistent enforcement that allowed nominee structures to operate with limited consequences in Phuket and other tourist areas for decades has shifted materially. Any buyer relying on the previous enforcement environment to assess their risk level is working from outdated information.
The basic legal framework
Thai law prohibits foreigners from owning land freehold. A Thai-majority limited company can own land legally. If a foreigner holds 49% of a Thai company and Thai nationals hold the remaining 51%, the company can purchase and register land in its name. The company is the landowner and the foreigner is a minority shareholder in the company that owns the land.
This structure is explicitly legal as long as the Thai shareholders have genuine equity interests in the company and are not nominees. The challenge is that many implementations of this structure use nominees, which is where the legal risk arises.
The nominee problem
A nominee shareholder is a Thai national who appears on the company share register but has no real economic interest. The foreigner pays for the shares, the Thai national signs paperwork as a shareholder, and the practical purpose is to satisfy the 51% Thai requirement without any genuine Thai investment. This arrangement violates the Land Code Act and the Civil and Commercial Code's provisions on nominee shareholders. Thai authorities can unwind such structures, prosecute the parties involved, and order the land sold.
The distinction between a legitimate structure and an illegal one is whether the Thai shareholders have genuine economic interest and decision-making power. If Thai shareholders signed blank transfer documents when they received shares, receive no dividends, and exert no actual control over company decisions, the arrangement is nominee-based regardless of how the corporate documents are drafted. The 2025-2026 crackdown has prosecuted arrangements that looked legally compliant on paper but failed this substance test.
A genuine Thai company structure
A legally sound Thai company structure for land ownership involves Thai shareholders who have genuine financial stakes. They pay for their shares with their own funds, participate in the company's decision-making, and share in the company's profits and losses. In practice this often means a joint venture with a Thai partner you actually trust โ a Thai spouse, a Thai business partner, or a Thai family member with a genuine relationship to the venture.
A properly structured genuine partnership is more defensible legally and creates a working relationship between the parties. It is also more complex to establish, since the Thai shareholders need to be comfortable taking on real shareholder obligations. Your Thai property lawyer should draft shareholders' agreements, preference share structures, and other mechanisms to protect your practical interests within the legal 49% minority position.
Preference shares and structural protections
One common structure involves issuing different classes of shares. The foreigner holds 49% as preference shares with enhanced voting rights or dividend priority. The Thai shareholders hold 51% as ordinary shares with full legal ownership but limited practical economic interest due to the preference share structure. Courts have scrutinised some of these arrangements and the protection they provide is not absolute, but they are a legally recognised mechanism for balancing interests within the allowed ownership structure. Your lawyer should design the share structure specifically for your situation rather than using a template.
Annual compliance requirements
Requirement | Cost estimate | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
Annual financial statements (DBD filing) | 15,000 to 25,000 baht | Annual |
Accounting and bookkeeping | 10,000 to 20,000 baht | Annual |
Annual shareholder meeting documentation | 5,000 to 10,000 baht | Annual |
Total ongoing compliance | 30,000 to 50,000 baht | Annual |
Failure to maintain compliance can result in the company being struck off the register, which creates serious complications for the land title. Factor this ongoing cost into your decision โ a leasehold structure has no equivalent annual expense.
When a Thai company makes sense
A genuine Thai company structure makes sense when you have a Thai business partner or family member who is genuinely co-investing, when the property purchase is part of a broader business activity such as a villa rental business, or when the legal structure genuinely reflects a joint venture arrangement. It makes less sense for a personal residence purchase where the sole purpose of the company is to circumvent the land ownership restriction with no genuine Thai equity participation.
For most personal foreign buyers seeking a villa to live in or rent out, the registered leasehold on the land combined with freehold ownership of the building is a simpler, more transparent, and less legally exposed structure than a company in the current enforcement environment. See the leasehold guide for that alternative.
Where to go from here
For the full legal picture on what foreigners can own: the foreigners buying property in Thailand guide covers freehold condos, leasehold, and company structures with the full 2025-2026 enforcement context.
For leasehold as the safer alternative for most personal buyers: the leasehold property guide covers the March 2025 Supreme Court ruling, registered leasehold protections, and the due diligence checklist for villa purchases.
For Phuket specifically where company structures have historically been most common: the Phuket property guide covers area pricing and structure options in the most active foreign buyer market in Thailand.
For Bangkok freehold as the cleanest alternative: the Bangkok condo investment guide covers the strongest freehold foreign buyer market in Thailand with no company structure required.






